-Rangers are to be colored as follows:
Red (Tyrannosaurus)- Male
Blue (Triceratops)- Male
Green (Stegosaurus)- Male
Yellow (Dino Unknown)- Female
White (Dino Uknown)- Female
It is assumed that one of the girls will have a Pteranodon, as to not step on tradition. Also, the girls will have skirts on their outfits.
-Red's mask looks similar to TyrannoRanger's. No surprise here, as AbaRed's mask followed the same basic pattern as well
-The rangers were pictured holding a Battery-like item in one hand, with a remote like device in the other. The Remote is thought to be the henshin device, whereas the Batteries will be the collectible item of this show
-The rangers were also holding various other items/weapons, but the poster only got a good look at red
-The robot will be composed of dinos with a train motif. It is said to resemble Travelion.
Please take all of this with a BIG GRAIN OF SALT.
More as it comes out.
thescreenwritingtutor
Tuesday, November 27, 2012
Friday, September 21, 2012
Lupin the 3rd Essay
The following is an essay I wrote for Film Class (got an A). This is what happens when I write something legit:
Lupin the Third:
The Castle of Cagliostro Lesson Plan:
Introduction:
The topic of what makes up a genre
is a question that is often complicated, and rarely resolved. This is true no
matter what you are analyzing. One thing to be wary of when conducting an
analysis is bias, or having a stigmatism. Such is the case when many critics
and audience goers examine and/or condemn animation; not because it is bad, but
merely because it is animated.
Culturally in the west, we also seem to have hard time
accepting animation as something that can be enjoyed by a broad audience. When
someone says animation, they think “cartoons, something for the kids”. They do
not think “a form of storytelling.”
What happens then when we inject the crime and mystery
genres into cartoon form? Do we automatically have to take the story as
something for kids; something light or with no substance? There is a great deal
of animation out there that is for children, but a lot more of it is in fact,
not really for kids at all. The question becomes, does something bearing a
heightened sense of reality automatically make it unreal? Why is it that most
people can suspend their disbelief for live-action, but not for animation? Both
are machinations of the human mind. Both exist on the same plane of un-reality,
and yet we do not treat them as the same thing: a story telling medium
And so, we get to the masterpiece that is Hayao Miyazaki’s
Lupin the Third: The Castle of Cagliostro. Yes it is a mouthful, and so for the
rest of the time, I am going to simply refer to it as Cagliostro. Cagliostro
has been hailed by many to be a work of art. But why? What lets this film
bypass common criticism and lets it be worthy of praise in the mainstream.
The first bit of notoriety probably rests with its director.
Hayao Miyazaki’s resume is long and impressive. He is generally regarded as a
master of anime, and has worked on many films, television shows, and comic
books based in that field.
What makes Miyazaki’s
works so brilliant is that one tends to forget what is real, and what is not,
when watching them. The majority of his work features at least some
supernatural elements, and could generally be brought under the umbrella of
“fantasy” or “Romance.”Miyazaki also likes to include Japanese mythology in his
films, for the most part taking that mythology and making it his own. Most of
his films feature younger characters interacting with their older peers, and so
in that respect, Cagliostro is a step out of the norm for him. Interestingly
enough, there is a strong, young female character at the heart of the film,
(Catherine, the Princess whom Lupin must save in an extremely Robin Hood-esque
plot) but she is much more subdued than most Miyazaki heroines.
Cagliostro’s Genre:
So where do we put Cagliostro when
it comes to genre? We have already established that Miyazaki works in fantasy,
and does so by making that fantasy reality. There are only scant moments in the
film (Lupin surviving a fall by running down an expensive castle wall) that
need the audience to accept the fantasy element for the story to work. I might
add though, that most action flicks out today do far worse in what is
“believable”, and really, nothing in Cagliostro jumps out at you as something
impossible.
Still, we have to be willing accept the possibly that it is
somewhat of fantasy because of the Director. Speaking of Action in the film,
there’s a lot of it, and we could easily call it an action film. Most action
films are crime films in some fashion. Personally, I think Cagliostro operates
best as a Crime film. There is a mystery in the film as well (Lupin helps Catherine
solve the seal to a family vault, of which there is a treasure trove; more on
that later), but the mystery portion is really left to the 3rd act,
and does not have much relevance to the plot, outside of motivating the Count
of Cagliostro in his wrongdoings.
-THIS IS WHERE I WOULD SHOW THE FILM-
Plot/Cagliostro as a
Pseudo-Caper:
Castle of Cagliostro, like most
works in the Lupin universe (and there are a lot) start with a Caper. In this
film we actually start off on the end of one. Lupin and Jigen are making away
with a score from a Casino in Monaco. Money in Lupin is often overly stylized,
and does weird things. One could attribute this to it being an anime, but I
would argue that the movie is actually showing money, even counterfeit money,
as a status of wealth. If we look wealthy, we are wealthy. Per the usual Lupin
episode, the Caper is planned by Lupin and Jigen. Out of the usual group, these
two could be considered almost-best friends. They’re faithful to each other, up
until a point.
The money stolen turns out to be counterfeit, called “Goat
Bills” in the film. The Goat Bills will tie into Cagliostro, whose Royal Seal
is of a Capricorn. The Count (and his ancestors) is revealed to be the root of
all counterfeit, and really depression, the world has ever gone through. Perhaps
a bit over the top, but the plot rings a little true of a Bond villain in some
way.
The film’s plot is fairly simple. After the discovery of the
Goat Bills, Lupin and Jigen end up in Cagliostro, where Lupin had been 10 years
prior, and met the Princess. As such, Lupin decides he needs to save Catherine
from the Count, who is forcing her into marriage so the family fortune (the
movie’s macguffin, but an interesting one) can be found. As such the two team
up with Goemon (a Samurai who is honorable except for being a criminal), Fujiko
(Lupin’s very own femme-fatale), and Zenigata (Interpol Officer who has been
chasing Lupin forever), to take down the Count and stop is plan. While the plan
is very heroic, it starts off as a Caper, one in which the cops are dragged
into as a plan of Lupin’s.
Multiculturalism:
What I think separates Cagliostro
the most from other Miyazaki works is its focus on multiculturalism. Lupin’s
nationality is only briefly mentioned in the respective series. He is most
likely Half-French, Half-Japanese, or some combination therein. We are led to
believe that Lupin’s cohorts are also Japanese, but given the fact that they
are globe hopping criminals who constantly change their names for sport,
pinning down nationality is hard. The only character with established
nationality is the Interpol Officer Zenigata, very much a relic of an older
Japan that maybe didn’t ever exist. Cagliostro, where the movie is set, is
never really given a distinct location, though we can assume it to be Italy.
The most important thing to take away from this is that
nationality isn’t really a factor here, though there does seem to be comment on
racism in the film when Zenigata is dealing with the Count of Cagliostro. While
Interpol and the UN are pretty much shown to be ineffectual (without the help
of Lupin and co.), there is evidence that the countries of the world can exist
together, just not in the current state of things.
The Family Fortune at the end of the film, (found when
uniting the Count and Catherine’s rings) floods the castle and reveals Roman
and/or Greek ruins underneath. Lupin claims it’s a “Treasure to be shared with
the world.” This is an interesting idea for a thief to have, and it really
shows how this stock character has evolved over the years. He has no interest
to profit from his score; he merely did this for the thrill, and to save the
girl. Which leads us to-
Lupin, the Criminal
as a Hero/The History of the Lupin Name:
When compared to other villains
from the past, Lupin only slightly fits. My best summation of the character is
taking James Bond, mixing him with Dick from Fun with Dick and Jane, and
throwing in a little of Robin Hood for good measure. In short, Lupin is
definitely a crook, but he is one with moral fiber. Only rarely do we see Lupin
do something villainous, and even then, it is usually played for laughter.
But why? It is very easy to call Lupin a Knight in this
film, and much like Robin Hood, is out to save the token Damsel in Distress in
Catherine. Historically though, this role given to Lupin in the film (and to a
lesser extent in the television series), harkens back to his routes in
non-animated culture.
Lupin the 3rd, officially Arsene Lupin the 3rd, is the
grandson of Maurice Leblanc's (1864-1941) character, Arsene Lupin. The original
Lupin is something of a cross between Robin Hood, and Sherlock Holmes. He's the
"Gentleman Thief", what would later evolve into the "Gentleman”
spy.
Arsene Lupin himself is inspired by the gothic hero
character, Rocambole, from the 19th century. The first short stories feature
Lupin appeared in magazines, starting in 1905. In fact, Leblanc was a contemporary
of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, and you can at least see the resemblance between
Holmes and Lupin in the sense that are calculating characters, versus those
that just use brute strength. Lupin's real life inspiration is unclear, though it
could have come from the anarchist Marius Jacob or Mirbeau's Arthur Lebeau,
another Gentleman thief.
Lupin the 3rd, is what would happen if the Sherlock Holmes
character went rogue. He's charmed by the life of being a thief, but at the same
time is chivalrous and wants to right wrongs. Unfortunately for Lupin, like
most of his counterparts, he is a playboy, if an unsuccessful one. Women are
often his downfall, if not directly, then through pursuit of them.
Fujiko: Femme Fatale,
Love Interest or Both?
Fujiko, Femme Fatale one minute,
lover the next is Lupin on-again, off-again girlfriend and love. The two are
entranced by each other, but also would stab each other in the back if they had
the chance to do so. Fujiko is given a reduced role in this movie, but her
motives are clear- she wants money, and only helps Lupin to save her own hide.
Unlike Femme Fatale of the Noir films though, Fujiko is good at heart. The film
often plays the “lesser of two evil” card with its characters, which is necessary
in a film where criminals are the protagonists.
Fujiko in this case becomes a symbol for the strong woman
type of Miyazaki, and is much like his character Lady Eboshi (Princess
Mononoke, 1997) who is a strong Female Leader out for power, and character you
don’t really see very often. Instead of Lupin’s downfall, she is actually an
asset, but only so long as it benefits her. As she says in the film, “We've
been comrades, we've been enemies, we've even been lovers."
The Police, Ineffectual:
The police, whether they be
military, Interpol or otherwise in Lupin, are made out to be ineffectual. They
are either stupendously unintelligent, or merely ineffectual. When we come to
the character of Zenigata though, there is an interesting division. Zenigata is
always bested by Lupin, but Lupin has a certain respect for him, almost
treating him like a father figure.
Likewise, Zenigata
almost seems to see Lupin as his awkward son. There is less actual anger
between the two, or more just playful annoyance. They even get to put their
rivalry on the shelf for this film, and team up. What is important here is that
we are seeing the criminal elevated to the level of law enforcement.
Interestingly enough we have an interestingly similar relationship on television
now; USA Network’s White Collar, a show in which an FBI Agent must take a White
Collar criminal and ladies man, like Lupin, as his partner.
Less that police ineffectiveness, I think the cops are shown
the way they are in Lupin merely because they need to be. If Lupin is not
better than them, there isn’t a movie. They just catch him. Together though,
both Lupin’s sense of justice, and the law’s sense of justice is satisfied, and
order is returned to the world.
In fact, when Lupin
and Jigen first stumble upon the old Cagliostro Palace (Catherine’s old home)
they find that it is in ruins. This is symbolic of the world order in shambles.
When at the end of the film the Ancient Ruins are revealed still intact, we are
given a visual clue that some sense of order has really returned.
Intertextuality:
The film briefly has run-ins with
intertextuality. Primarily, I think Miyazaki definitely put his stamp on this
film, and as it was one of his first directing jobs (including on the
televisions show) I think one can heavily see evidence of the same themes that
make up his later films.
Besides Japanese mythology, Miyazaki has been seemingly
influenced by many Western authors including Lewis Carroll and Roald Dahl. If
one watches his later films, there is certainly evidence of that (Miyazaki’s
Spirited Away is essentially a take on Alice in Wonderland.)
An interesting scene in the film, that may be intertextual,
or just my own imagination, happens when Lupin and the Count are fighting
inside a clock tower. The fight has Lupin slide through one of the clock gears,
and have to slide around it. The shot is incredibly reminiscent of Charlie
Chaplin’s Modern Times. That film, about two poor people dealing with poverty
and still finding happiness, hits very close to home to Lupin’s ideals and
themes.
Closing Statement:
Lupin,
essentially, what you'd get if you threw the gambit of crime films into a
blender, and set it to "animate." The Castle of Cagliostro is simply
put, a good film. I think its blending of so many genres makes it something
that a majority of people can enjoy, but as with anything, you need to have a
taste for it. I think the biggest point to take away from this lesson plan is
that animated films should not be looked down upon for simply being animated.
This is something that has started to shift in the culture, with animated films
being recognized more often, but I think there is still a block for most
audience goers that do not allow animation to be anything but “kid’s movies.” I
doubt anyone could come away from Castle of Cagliostro, or most Miyazaki works,
and claim this as the truth.
REFERENCES:
Japanese Interview with Miyazaki:
Leblanc Works/Arsene Lupin:
Rocambole info:
FURTHER INFO:
Castle of Calgliostro Trailer and Some Clips:
Sunday, October 30, 2011
"Pre-Holidays" Do we really need them?
I'm going to jump on my soap box for a minute. I like it. I'm pretty sure it's Dial. Keep in mind that I've done no research to support my argument. This is just an ignorant, late night spilling of emotion:
Today (Sunday the 30th, may be the 31st when it's posted), I was informed by someone that Yesterday (Saturday the 29th), was some sort of Pre-Halloween.
I stopped in my tracks.
My brain thought so many things. Halloween is, already, a Pre-Holiday. All Hallows Eve, i.e., the evening before All Hallows. Why do we need to prepare for the preparing of a holiday? Doesn't that just detract from the Holiday's value?
Halloween has become, unfortunately, another excuse to party. So just making up another day to party seems downright stupid.
((Now, my friends and I did have a party on Friday night this past weekend (Friday the 28th), but it's a annual one we throw, and we have before Halloween, specifically to avoid interfering with other people's holiday plans. ))
I personally hate parties (I also hate fun on a moral basis), but to gather with friends and family is one of the reasons we have holidays to begin with. People celebrating their Pre-Halloween? They just wanted another day to get drunk.
And that brings me to Thanksgiving Eve. Really? Really? Seriously? Eating yourself to near-death the next day isn't enough, you have to pre-game?
Swear to God, if I ever hear the phrase "Pre-Christmas Eve".....
I'll probably just ignore it, like everything else.
Today (Sunday the 30th, may be the 31st when it's posted), I was informed by someone that Yesterday (Saturday the 29th), was some sort of Pre-Halloween.
I stopped in my tracks.
My brain thought so many things. Halloween is, already, a Pre-Holiday. All Hallows Eve, i.e., the evening before All Hallows. Why do we need to prepare for the preparing of a holiday? Doesn't that just detract from the Holiday's value?
Halloween has become, unfortunately, another excuse to party. So just making up another day to party seems downright stupid.
((Now, my friends and I did have a party on Friday night this past weekend (Friday the 28th), but it's a annual one we throw, and we have before Halloween, specifically to avoid interfering with other people's holiday plans. ))
I personally hate parties (I also hate fun on a moral basis), but to gather with friends and family is one of the reasons we have holidays to begin with. People celebrating their Pre-Halloween? They just wanted another day to get drunk.
And that brings me to Thanksgiving Eve. Really? Really? Seriously? Eating yourself to near-death the next day isn't enough, you have to pre-game?
Swear to God, if I ever hear the phrase "Pre-Christmas Eve".....
I'll probably just ignore it, like everything else.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)